On Thursday 6th March, students of
the Epsom College Economics and Enterprise Society travelled to the acclaimed
Eton College, where we were educated on the measurement of economic and social
progress by Diane Coyle OBE. Mrs Coyle is a freelance economist and author of
the newly published GDP: A Brief but
Affectionate History. Her talk consisted primarily about the shortcomings
of GDP as a measurement of economic and social growth; she brought to our
attention the extent of unrecorded economic activity including the informal and
intangible economy. For example, the disregard of housework: if we included
housework in GDP, our economy may be nearly double the size, however the
government discount it on the grounds that it’s too difficult to record. The
second half of her talk consisted of possible alternatives to GDP, which
included Human Development Index, Happiness, or measuring what is important to
the population. What fascinated me the most was the measurement of happiness.
She noted that in Bhutan, instead of calculating GDP, the government measure Gross
National Happiness (it’s even illegal to mention GDP). This evaluation of
happiness is an attempt to unveil the quality of life using not only economic terms, but psychological terms, which seems only fitting – social welfare
should be accounted for when assessing the extent to success of an economy. A
booming economy with an unhappy population may not represent full potential or
achievement. Ultimately, Diane’s conclusions that we should measure economic
activity (GDP), social welfare, and sustainability were thoroughly convincing,
and has certainly made me think more about the social and psychological sides
of economics.
No comments:
Post a Comment